tpot (at) frungy . org
|
Thu, 30 Oct 2003Checking out a repository: svn co svn+ssh://ozlabs.org/home/mbp/svn/ipmimsg/trunkAdding files to the .cvsignore equivalent: svn propedit svn:ignore .Subversion is very neat, but I haven't really used it enough to remember how to do things I can do without thinking in CVS. posted at: 15:54 | path: /software/subversion | permanent link to this entry Thu, 23 Oct 2003There are 6 critical updates for you to install "A security issue has been identified that could allow an attacker to remotely compromise a computer running Microsoft® Windows® and gain complete control over it" is a registered trademark of Microsoft. posted at: 10:10 | path: /rants/microsoft | permanent link to this entry Tue, 21 Oct 2003I tried another mailing list (the ethereal developers list) and a posting under a previously unused email address resulted in viruses delivered to that address. Unlike the Samba users' list, the first virus didn't arrive until a couple of days later. posted at: 13:04 | path: /internet/spam | permanent link to this entry Mon, 20 Oct 2003We have been doing some landscaping to our front garden over the last couple of weeks. The grandson of the last owners came around to collect a crabapple tree we saved. It was a gift to the grandparents when the grandson was little. He is going to replant it on his property in Murrambateman. I hope it survives. posted at: 11:04 | path: /garden | permanent link to this entry Wed, 15 Oct 2003Another handful of virus laden emails have arrived at my honeypot address including this one: If there's blame to be handed around, surely Telstra and other ISPs forwarding on known virus infected emails should get some. I don't know why they think this is a good idea. posted at: 17:24 | path: /internet/spam | permanent link to this entryOct 15 06:32:45 dp postfix/cleanup[24928]: 915AB2C05F: discard: header Content-type: application/x-msdownload; name=Q878311.exe from mta08bw.bigpond.com[144.135.24.137]; from=<rosebery@XXXXXXXX.com.au> to=<asmithee@samba.org> proto=ESMTP helo=<mta08bw.bigpond.com> Recently a number of patrons of the Samba mailing list have been complaining that they have signed up and shortly afterwards been inundated with virus emails. It turns out that the person in question has actually posted to the list as well. Various stupid theories on why this is happening and how it is all the fault of the Samba Team have been proposed (including one threat of "we should be able to sue you for this"). While I now ignore the clueless rants of whingers who don't understand how mail works, this problem intruiges me. What seems to be happening is someone makes a post to the mailing list using a valid email address. The fraction of the membership of the mailing list that is currently infected with the latest Microsoft virus of the month receives the email and starts propagating itself to this new address. Martin pointed out that this sort of email is much worse than spam. In general spammers aren't interested in sending you too many copies of advertisements for penis enlargement pills. I only receive a handful of duplicate spams, most of which have been sent to different addresses which are delivered to the same inbox. The current crop of viruses don't seem to have any self limiting property that prevents multiple emails being sent to the same address. As an experiment, I made a post using a new email address to the Samba list. I will keep track of all replies to this address and see if there is one or many list subscribers that are sending virus emails to list posters. It may be possible to determine whether this is malicious or accidental. As I have been writing this entry, there have already been three hits on the email address since the posting about 15 minutes ago: The first log entry is the posting record from mailman, the second an autoreply - only merely annoying. The last two are viruses, perhaps different ones. Interestingly enough, there is no-one currently subscribed to the Samba mailing list from iprimus.com.au although it could have been sent from a virtual host. posted at: 14:15 | path: /internet/spam | permanent link to this entryOct 15 03:32:18 2003 (25821) post to samba from asmithee@samba.org, size=2214, message-id=<20031015032935.GA25510@proforma>, success Oct 15 03:31:31 dp postfix/smtpd[3279]: B8F7A2C2C4: reject: RCPT from mx10.kentrox.com[192.228.33.31]: 550 <asmithee@samba.org>: User unknown in local recipient table; from=<XXXXXXXX@kentrox.com> to=<asmithee@samba.org> proto=ESMTP helo=<mx10.kentrox.com> Oct 15 03:45:38 dp postfix/cleanup[4584]: 51D5B2C07F: discard: header Content-Type: application/x-msdownload; name="Install9.exe" from smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au[210.50.30.52]; from=<cwkd@iprimus.com.au> to=<asmithee@samba.org> proto=ESMTP helo=<smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au> Oct 15 03:53:01 dp postfix/cleanup[5577]: 3E6272C018: reject: body <iframe src=3D"cid:brrygfk" height=3D0 width=3D0></iframe> from smtp02.syd.iprimus.net.au[210.50.76.52]; from=<cwkd@iprimus.com.au> to=<asmithee@samba.org> proto=ESMTP helo=<smtp02.syd.iprimus.net.au>: Message content rejected Thu, 09 Oct 2003As they say on Slashdot, YOU FAIL IT! posted at: 16:35 | path: /internet/spam | permanent link to this entryTo: admin@samba.org From: wrong_address@entran.com Subject: YOUR EMAIL WAS REJECTED! IMPORTANT NOTICE!!! Your email to Entran was not received - the email address used is incorrect, please check it carefully. Wed, 08 Oct 2003Get out of your parent's basement! From the Guardian Unlimited: Aaron Caffrey, 19, is alleged to have brought computer systems to a halt at the Port of Houston, in Texas, from his bedroom in Shaftesbury, Dorset, in what police believe to be the first electronic attack to disable a critical part of a country's infrastructure.Yep, IT infrastructure is so crappy it can be DoS'ed by a bored teenager from his bedroom. Bruce Schnier has pointed out on many occasions the woeful state of computer security is not really going to improve unless we can effectively protect it from slightly motivated teenagers. Also: Caffrey was arrested in January last year and told police he had used the nickname Aaron X. He denied targeting the port's system but admitted to knowing what a "denial of service" attack was and that they were "easy to perform".posted at: 17:24 | path: | permanent link to this entry Mon, 06 Oct 2003The power went out just now followed half a second later by a huge clap of thunder. Obviously something was hit by lightening. Using the light from the laptop screen (heh) I fumbled around to find the box of candles and emergency stuff from under the bed only to find there was nothing to place the candles on! There's nothing like actually testing your emergency procedures to see whether they actually work. I'm surviving by reading cached pages in Mozilla by candlelight. posted at: 21:24 | path: | permanent link to this entryFri, 03 Oct 2003"Blame India for that jobless recovery" From The Sydney Morning Herald: ... Surely large and inappropriate on-costs aren't being used as an excuse to "offshore" (aargh - another perfectly good adjective converted to a verb) workers to countries with cheaper labour costs? It must cost a lot of money to run those Gulfstreams though. The title of the article is a bit emotive though. How about "Blame inefficient accounting for that jobless recovery"? I don't think that would sell many newspapers though. posted at: 11:53 | path: | permanent link to this entryC/R: Fighting spam by creating more of it. I love the complaint of how he is receiving automated junk-emails in his automated junk email. You would also think that since he is paying money for this service (the address was one from Spamarrest) that they would not send out challenges to mailer daemon addresses.
I can't believe people pay money to have someone annoy others on
their behalf! posted at: 08:27 | path: /internet/spam | permanent link to this entryThu, 02 Oct 2003For the last 18 months I have been a happy subscriber to Emusic. It's a neat little operation where you pay a small monthly fee (less than the cost of one CD) and can download mp3's from large range of recording labels. The files you can download are not Top 40 or latest release stuff, but rather old back catalogs of less popular artists, 60's jazz, blues, weird electronica and much more. About 3 months ago Emusic decided to change the method of downloading tunes to require a proprietary binary-only download manager. Previously, downloads occured either directly through the browser, or by using Zinf. As you can probably predict, the Linux version of the download manager was a complete disaster. Apart from the many cosmetic bugs, it had the annoying tendency to segfault whenever the C library was upgraded. The solution was to download an old version of glibc and use $LD_PRELOAD - not really something your average Linux user is expected to be able to do. After a couple of months of procrastination and waiting to see if the bugs would be fixed, I contacted customer service. The helpdesk offered to release me from my contact and wouldn't be drawn into a discussion of the technical issues or provide any information on the status of the Linux download manager whatsoever. Basically, I was told if I didn't like it I could go away. )-: So I did. I'm pretty sure all the things they want to do such as limiting the number of concurrent connections, the number of consecutive downloads, watermarking (what is that random junk that mpg123 complains about seeing at the start of the mp3 files?) can be done server-side. There's no apparent technical reason why this should require a proprietary piece of software running on the client. posted at: 14:58 | path: /internet | permanent link to this entry | ||||||||||||||||