|
|
The cost of operating system integration
I see several problems with integrating "non-core components" in to
an operating system. My example in this case is Internet Explorer.
- The component requires patching even if it is not being used.
From the latest update for Windows 2003 server:
"Security issues
identified in Internet Explorer could allow an attacker to compromise
systems with Internet Explorer installed (even if it not used as the
Web browser)."
It's a bit rich to use the phrase "systems with Internet Explorer
Installed" as if there is even a choice in the matter.
- Again, from Windows Update:
"After installation, you may have
to restart your computer."
Excuse me? Rebooting after upgrading a web browser?
- I've heard Tridge say that making technical decisions for
marketing or political reasons is nearly always a bad idea. I think
integrating IE into the operating system as an anti-competitive
measure is one of these bad ideas.
The problem that grates the most with me is the last one. Sacrificing
design quality for marketing reasons is one thing, but for political
(read antitrust) reasons is just insane.
posted at: 14:39 | path: /rants/microsoft | permanent link to this entry | |